Matthew Biggins Giving machines, AI-enhanced ones, to decide on a human’s worth is dangerous. I’m sure that it could calculate in a split second the #utility of each person based on what they have done so far.

What the machine cannot do exactly (it can only estimate) what a human is capable of in the future, by choosing to save “A” and letting “B” die, is a possibility that we cannot allow.

Why would the world of a dystopian world even need humans? If machines are inferior and less prone to weaknesses and violence?

The movie, “Ghost in the Shell” comes to mind.